Wind Project puts bald eagles in danger

Industrial wind not held accountable for violating the Golden and Bald Eagle Protection Act.
Powered by Blogger.
Showing posts with label Bill Grant. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bill Grant. Show all posts

Tell the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board What You Think

Today is the state-wide kickoff of a series of citizen forums advertised as asking Minnesotans their thoughts about the future of Minnesota's Environmental policies. The forums are sponsored by the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB). I encourage Minnesotans to attend and/or send your comments to the EQB in writing. I especially encourage factual scientifically based and concrete experiential feedback for this collection of nine Governor-appointed State agency heads.

Citizen Forums
Citizen Forums: The Governor's Cabinet will host six interactive Citizen Forums held in each region of the state to present report card findings, gather public feedback, and engage in meaningful local conversations about regional economic and environmental issues.

I've reviewed the "Report Card" which the EQB site bills as, "An environmental and energy report card measuring Minnesota’s performance in clean air, clean water, and clean energy." I can't see where it measures so much a propagandizes, but I encourage you to read it and provide your own thoughts to the EQB.

The EQB is pointing to Governor Dayton's Executive Order 11-32 as the origins of the Report Card, and the upcoming March 2013 Environmental Congress. I read the the Governor's order which points to recent legislation seeking coordination and streamlining of environmental permitting processes. I couldn't find any mention of, or any recommendations for, streamlining in the "Report Card".

A couple other notes of interest:

Ellen Anderson is apparently facilitating and hosting the citizen's forums. Ms. Anderson is a former Minnesota Senator and former Minnesota Public Utilities Chairperson.

Bill Grant is the primary person responsible for the content of the Report Card. Mr. Grant is the current Director of the Office of Energy Resources (formerly called the Office of Energy Security) at the Minnesota Department of Commerce. This office took over most energy facilities permitting activities from the EQB in 2007. Mr. Grant was the head of the Minnesota Izaak Walton League for 10 years prior to his current position. 

I asked Bill Grant why the 2007 Minnesota Renewable Energy Standards specifically exempt industrial wind from all electrical regulatory laws, including exemption from performing an environmental impact statement; and exemptions from agricultural land use laws and the Minnesota Constitution. Mr. Grant explained that the "design goal" behind Minnesota's industrial wind mandate was to "install as much wind as quickly as possible in order to get as much federal money as possible."

The Report Card makes much of Minnesotans passing a new tax on themselves - the Legacy Amendment for environment and the arts. But the Report Card seems to have forgotten a longstanding significant source of funding: the Environmental and Natural Resources Trust Fund from the Minnesota Lottery and administered by the Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCCMR). 







Read More...

Hydroelectricity: Are Water and Wind Transparent?

Bills making their way through the Minnesota legislature would bring a degree of honesty to "renewable energy" counting. Legislators and citizens clamored last year to count all the hydroelectricity that the state's utilities already buy and consumers already use. Minnesota's Next Generation Energy Act recognized hydroelectricity as a renewable energy source, but simultaneously forbids counting electricity from generators of over 100 MW capacity.

Minnesota's Renewable Energy Standard (RES) mandates that 25% of electricity must come from "renewable" sources by 2025. This eliminates the State's primary hydroelectricity sources - Manitoba and Missouri River basin. House File 2190 and companion Senate File 1906 would address this.

Illuminating the connection to industrial wind, Center of the American Experiment's Peter Nelson provided testimony to the Senate Committee on Energy and the Environment last week. 

"While it is likely that utilities are underreporting the rate impact, it is possible that recent additions of wind energy sources posed little to no impact on electricity rates.  But that’s not because wind energy is a cost competitive energy alternative.  Rather, it’s because the federal government heavily subsidized wind energy development.  Indeed, federal taxpayers have been footing the bill for Minnesota’s RES."

"Looking to the future, Minnesota cannot depend on federal subsidies to cover the cost of the state’s RES.  These subsidies are set to expire at the end of 2012 and they are unlikely to be renewed in the current economic and political environment.  Navigant Consulting compared the levelized cost for a 100 MW wind plant depending on certain policy scenarios.  The cost was around $40/MWhr in 2011 with all of the federal subsidies in place.  After the federal subsidies expire, the cost rises to around $100/MWhr in 2013.  In its December 2011 Resource Plan update, Xcel reports that “post-2012 wind projects may be significantly more expensive if they are unable to rely upon the availability of the [federal Production Tax Credit.]”

Bill Grant, Director of Commerce's Office of Energy Resources, stated that Minnesota's 2007 Renewable Energy Standard was designed for "speed".  The goal was to install as many wind turbines as possible, as fast as possible, in order to get as much federal subsidy money as possible. 

Water is transparent: Counting water generated electricity fulfills the State's mandate. 

Wind is transparent: Citizen tax and rate money taken by force of law for a contrived "need".

Honest counting of hydroelectrical usage removes the artificially contrived "need" for industrial wind. The Coalition for Sensible Siting encourages honesty and transparency in energy policy.  Minnesota legislators are encouraged to support HF 2190/ SF 1906.

Peter Nelson's 2011 report, "Recommendations for Promoting Affordable and Competitive Energy Rates in Minnesota", provides a comprehensive RES analysis.
 
Read More...
 
Copyright (c) 2010 Blogger templates by Bloggermint